A Forex View From Afar

A Trader's Look At A Trader's Life

Forex Analysis

Still no green from equities

Written by A Forex View From Afar on Thursday, January 31, 2008

Still no green from equities
Back to www.thelfb.com

I was talking some time ago about equity markets not wanting to show any sign of green even after 175 points cut and the President speaking about the resuscitation plan. You can read it here

Now, we are 6 days later, 225 points cut, from which 125 point in 8 days, and the famous plan has reached congress with real chances of being adopted and guess what: equities still don't want to grow.

We could say that equities don't show any green is a surprise, but really...it isn't such a big one.
The Fed rate cut was too late, much too late. After cutting 2 times 25points from October to December now they cut 125 in a week. That's a jump.
Wall Street guys were crying for such big cuts some time ago and now they have it. But now they are crying after the insurance companies to be saved. If we go on with thid, the insurance companies will be saved when Wall Street guys will cry for something else. This is what behind the curb (or simpler lagging) is all about.

About the insurance companies now, some rating agencies are starting to cut their ratings, from triple AAA (only goodness know how they got it) to AA and probably much lower, in the face of bankruptcy.
Once the insurance companies are downgraded, so are the bonds that were insuraned by those companies. Banks, mutual funds, pensions fund can't keep those bonds on the book, so they have to take those bonds off, and faces more huge losses.
This line should provide an interesting view from the inside:

"Industry experts say banks so far have been writing down their CDO holdings under the assumption that the insurers won't face sharp ratings downgrades"

Translation: We'll probably see more losses coming. By that time, who really knows what the sub-prime had destroyed in other parts of the economy? Oh, I forget, it has already draged down the entire economy...

Source:
WSJ: More Subprime Pain in Store

Please add your Comments

Fox Mulder leaves aliens for sub-prime

Written by A Forex View From Afar on Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Back to www.thelfb.com

Fox Mulder has decided to leave behind aliens and extraterrestrial life and focus on US problems. One of those problems is the wide spread sub-prime, that almost bankrupt financial institutions.

FBI announced that it will start investigations on 14 companies related to the sub-prime crises, focusing on accounting fraud, securitization of loans and insider trading. These companies weren't nominated but they are probably the companies that made possible the sub-prime, from bundling to selling.

While Fox is on the run, chasing the sub-prime mess, Dana Scully will communicate with Justice Department, US Securities and Exchange Commission and various state attorneys.

I tend to agree with FBI by sending their top 2 agents; it's a miracle, a wonder, a rare phenomenal, all at the same time, how some bonds got AAA rating when some of them just didn't make out for triple C

Just for me (and the rest of planet) wasn't it easier just to have a real regulators on the financial system?

Source:
WSJ: FBI Launches Subprime Probe

Please add your Comments

Please cut, we are baking another bubble.

Written by A Forex View From Afar on Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Back to www.thelfb.com

Markets do not want to move too much these days, everybody is waiting for the FOMC decision on Wednesday. This will clear up things for some time ahead, either letting markets run (see Forest Gump) or make them see (and feel) long forgotten levels like 11k,10k or even lower. Equity Markets are expecting a 50 basis point reduction. Whatever happens we would recommend trying to avoid the news, and stick with the momentum. It’s much safer this way when trading Forex

After the 75 point reduction last week, and with another 50 points likely coming this week, it would take us to 125 points cut between 2 FOMC meetings, which is a lot of lost Interest, imagine how the American saving population feels. (Mind you that is a bit of a Storm in a Tea Cup because the US Savings rate is in the negative; forget the lower Interest, it is not affecting Average Joe). Also, this would take us under the inflation benchmark, of 4.1% on a YoY, and 3.2%annualized, as measured by CPI.

What does this means? In the simplest form I can spell it out…spend as much as you can and when you reach your limit, go get a loan.
If this second rate cut materializes, another 50 point to 3.0%, we won’t have anything left to protect our self from the devaluing dollar but just spending or investing. Banks will offer negative return for your deposits, as probably most bonds will start to move to.
And why not take another loan, when inflation is 3% and you have to pay 4% interest rate. You’ll actually get a loan with a 1% interest rate. That’s a pretty good deal.

This is a risky move from the Fed, these strategies are taken to boost spending and cut savings and this is what usually leads to bubbles. We got the housing bubble the same way. If regulators refuse to stop the Boom and Bust Cycle, we’ll have soon another bubble to burst..

Please add your Comments

US New Home Sales: Can you smell recession?

Written by A Forex View From Afar on Monday, January 28, 2008

Back to www.thelfb.com

We still don't have any good news out the US. Today was the time for New Home Sales release to disappoint us.
Markets expected 645k, but the numbers came in poorer, 604k, having a 4.7% drop Month over Month. Here you can check them out, at TheLFB.com calendar

Forex markets didn't look too impressed with these numbers, why would they? All day long we have negative numbers shooting out of the US and it seems the equities markets are leading the dance for now...so who is actually interested in those silly numbers? We are, because we can't just ignore the facts.

Even if trading should be boring, now we'll go to the fun part of forex trading...spotting a recession. The inventories of single family houses will be depleted in 11.7 months (not seasonally adjusted) at the current sales level, the Census Bureau tells us. We can see it in the chart.


click for larger view

Recognize the green shaded areas? They all are recession periods, when the house inventories would be depleted in 10 months or more.
Out of the last 6 periods, only twice did the inventories go above a 10 months period. Those 2 recessions are in 2001, the consequences of Y2K and the dot com Bubble, and 1970 that was mainly blamed on the gold-standard inflation. In the rest of 4 recessions, the inventories period went above the 10 month benchmark, but didn't stay too long there; the longest period was 5 months.
We are now 2 months above this 10 months benchmark, so in all of this there is a good sign that things can change.

It's very interesting that almost every time that these inventories went up, the US entered in a recession.
During the famous '87 market crash, the period to sell the house inventories also skyrocketed.

Please, add this fact to the list of reasons why we're heading to a recession.


Please add your Comments

What to do, where to run?

Written by A Forex View From Afar on Friday, January 25, 2008

Back to www.thelfb.com

We had a rate cut and a very big one, not seen for some time, a 0.75% rate cut...we heard Bush plans to cut taxes , we missed them since 2001 (if I recall right, we are right now in a tax cut mode, until 2010) ...with all this, the stock markets still doesn’t grow.
The next step is to inject adrenalin to into the stock market's heart. There isn’t any other way to resuscitate it.

Seriously, what do they need or want to have some decent growth? The only step left for the Fed is to start giving money for free. Each one will receive a $10,000 coupon in your mail, of course tax free. Your only charge will be to spend it by the end of this quarter.
Maybe Wall Street will be happy, although I'm not really sure.

Going back to the rate cut, we took out some annalist opinions from one of Bloomberg’s article related to it. Here we go

Stanford University Professor John Taylor says the move ``made sense''

Harvard University's Martin Feldstein calls it a ``very good thing.''

Morgan Stanley's Stephen Roach counters that the decision was ``dangerous, reckless and irresponsible,''

Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz says it resulted from ``bad economic management.''

``By easing aggressively on the basis of no new information, they're sending a message that they have to protect and defend the markets,'' Roach, Morgan Stanley's Asia chairman

``Doing it at this time, I think it made sense,'' Taylor, author of a landmark monetary-policy formula and the Treasury Department

`A Bad Precedent'
``I am concerned that they moved a week before a scheduled meeting, seemingly in direct response to global equities, and that sets a bad precedent,'' says Mickey Levy, chief economist at Bank of America Corp. in New York. ``Waiting a week would not have affected the thrust of monetary policy.''

By contrast, former Fed governor Lyle Gramley says that ``this was a necessary move, and highly desirable.'' Up until this week, Bernanke and his colleagues were ``timid,'' he says.

``The Fed just didn't recognize the severity of this crisis and therefore didn't act in a timely fashion,'' says Gramley, now a senior economic adviser at Stanford Group Co. in Washington. ``Had the Fed not done it, it would have been considered not just in a slumber but in a coma.''

``The cut is not the problem,'' ``The communication is key. The Fed has to explain clearly to the market why it did what it did in order to avoid a panic scenario. From this point of view, the Fed still lacks clarity in its speeches.'' says Christophe Donay, head of economic research and investment strategy at Landsbanki Kepler in Paris.

George Soros said the Fed is ``doing the right thing,'' just not quickly enough. ``I think the Fed is well behind the curve, and has been reacting instead of being proactive,'' he said.

``The Fed rate cut showed that the Fed can be pushed around by the markets,'' says Nick Parsons, head of market strategy at National Australia Bank Ltd.'s NabCapital unit in London. ``The Fed is a follower and not a leader. In an attempt to gain control, the Fed has lost credibility.''

Mark MacQueen, partner and portfolio manager in Austin, Texas, at Sage Advisory Services Ltd., which oversees $5 billion.
``The 75 basis-point cut was too much too quick,'' Bernanke didn't get ``enough bang for his buck. He used a lot of ammo for very little reward.''

``The Fed has been aggressive and has been helpful,'' David Rubenstein, co-founder of buyout firm Carlyle Group, said in an interview in Davos. ``Probably, had it done what it did a little bit earlier, it might have been more helpful to the markets. But I think the key is the stimulus package.''


Sorry about this long list of quotes, but we had to get to grips with this.

Can you draw a conclusion? We can’t. Trade desks, financial annalists, economists still haven’t got a clue. Just watch how remote and opposite their opinions are.
For the moment, I think I’ll go with Mr. Christophe Donay “The Fed has to explain clearly to the market why it did what it did”.
How can we trade, if nobody has any clue?

It’s clear on the New World, things aren’t too clear, but on the Old World, things are perfectly clear enough; inflation is the only concern and nothing else. Mr. Weber, head of the Bundesbank, declared they are ready to act pre-mptively, on inflation of course, not on recession.

"If there is broad political support for wage claims that don't conform to price stability, this could require additional monetary policy action," said Mr. Weber

Saying about inflation fears in every possible sentence, the Heads of the Ecb will soon start to sound like Paulson singing his job’s anthem “We need a strong dollar”.
Traders, please remember, Trade Desks don’t buy dollars just out of desire, but because whenever they need a comfort blanket, they need it to buy $ denominated bonds.

Sources:
Fxstreet: ECB's Weber: Ready To Act Preemptively On CPI- Report
Bloomberg: Bernanke Earns Feldstein Cheers, Roach Jeers for Emergency Cut

Please add your Comments

Rogue Trader's job applicantion

Written by A Forex View From Afar on Thursday, January 24, 2008

Back to www.thelfb.com

Got some guts and some dice? If you do, let's go and hire on a bank's trade desk.
Don't worry about the losses, we have dices to show us the right path and we have guts, and a lot to support those loses.

Today, Societe Generale Bank in Paris took one of the biggest loses recorded from rogue traders: $7.2 billion from a Paris based trader who was deeply involved in the European index futures. He used his back-office experience to hide his losses.

Looks like he didn't know about the 2% rule, which Forex traders should worship, especially retail traders.

Add to this, the credit market loses (read sub-prime) and you get the perfect case of a bank which depleted its capital and it's now looking for investors. $5.5 in their pockets, bank sources tells.

Remember Nick Leeson? It's one of the most known cases of a rogue trader. He bankrupted Barings Bank through trading frauds on Nikkei Futures. He hid his loses through an account named 88888, which ironically is considered a lucky number by the Eastern cultures.
Want to hear the similarity between Nick Leeson and Societe General? They both got awards and trophies for trading before the losses were discovered...

Despite what I said in the opening paragraph, trading for a trade desk is something very hard. Immense pressure, a lot of money flowing around, money which a person is unlikely to see all his life, that pressure is huge. But this still doesn't excuse these traders who fraud the system to hide loses.

Wikipedia provides us a Hall Of Fame with trading loses. Watch out, don't you make it on the list. See it here

Sources:
Bloomberg: Societe Generale Reports Record Trading Loss of EU4.9 Billion
BBC: Rogue trader to cost SocGen $7bn

Please add your Comments

TheLFB Team & The View From Afar Blog

© 2008 A Forex View From a far Trading Blog

Trade Desk View

Fundies and Trading
There is a constant question from some traders as to why anybody would ever need to consider the ‘F’ word when trading. Fundamentals: what is so damaging at looking at both Technical charts and having a Fundamental filter to gauge how many Lots to put on? Why is it that accepting that Technicals give us price points to trade, but Fundamentals determine the direction that we travel is so difficult for some traders to accept? Without a Fundamental Filter very few pure Technical traders would have seen this Dollar move coming today.

Want to subscribe?


Subscribe in a reader.